EXPLAINING THE
MOTIONS OF THE WANDERING STARS

A
nice illustration of the various models for the motions of the wandering stars
is available on this YouTube video:
Click here if video does not work.
Skip the
first 16 seconds! The
illustration of the models is from a planetarium in Italy, but someone tacked
on a lousy attempt at illustrating retrograde motion of Saturn, and they tacked
on an overly general statement. From 16
seconds forward the video is good.
The
first model seen in the video shows Aristotle’s
geocentric explanation for how a wandering
star like Saturn moves:
|
This
shows more detail than is discussed in the book, but notice that in this
model the distance between the Earth and the wanderer does not change, so there is no explanation of why a wanderer
increases in brightness when it goes through retrograde motion. |
|
The
second model seen in the video shows Ptolemy’s
geocentric explanation for how a
wandering star like Saturn moves:
|
This
shows the epicycle and deferent in action.
The epicycle causes the retrograde motion, and carries the wanderer
closer and farther from Earth, explaining the why a wanderer increases in
brightness when it goes through retrograde motion. |
|
The
last model seen in the video shows Copernicus’s heliocentric explanation
for how a wandering star like Saturn moves:
|
The
action of the Earth passing between the sun and the wanderer causes the illusion of retrograde motion (the
wander itself never moves backwards), and the approach of the Earth toward the
wanderer as it passes explains why a wanderer increases in brightness when it
goes through retrograde motion. That
the sun is the center of motion for both Earth and wanderer explains why retrograde
motion occurs only when the sun, Earth, and wanderer fall along a line. |
|